Choose your supervisorChoose your supervisor

At vejlederen er bedre til at hjælpe når man føler sig lost og ikke bare giver en intetsigende mail om det man har skrevet, hvilket har med virket til...

0 downloads 112 Views 47KB Size
Choose your supervisor Respondents

Percent

Write name

13

100.0%

Total

13

100.0%

Respondents

Percent

In a group

9

69.2%

Individually

4

30.8%

13

100.0%

Respondents

Percent

9

69.2%

Choose your supervisor - Write name Marita Svane Marita Svane Wenwen Yu Keld Christensen Simona-Diana Saptebani Thomas Bjørn Nielsen Jill Olav Jull Sørensen Romé Romeo V. Turcan Marita Svane Keld Christensen Susan Vonsild Susan Vonsild

Did you compose the project in a group or individually?

Total

1. Has the scope of your supervision been adequate?

Yes

No Total

4

30.8%

13

100.0%

2. How would you rate the quality of the supervising? - Professionally in relation to the subject of the project Respondents

Percent

Very Good

5

38.5%

Good

4

30.8%

Somewhat

1

7.7%

Bad

2

15.4%

Very bad

1

7.7%

I don't know

0

0.0%

13

100.0%

Respondents

Percent

Very Good

3

23.1%

Good

5

38.5%

Somewhat

3

23.1%

Bad

2

15.4%

Very bad

0

0.0%

I don't know

0

0.0%

13

100.0%

Respondents

Percent

Very good

6

46.2%

Good

4

30.8%

Somewhat

2

15.4%

Total

2. How would you rate the quality of the supervising? - Methodological

Total

3. How would you rate the supervisors preparation for the meetings?

Bad

1

7.7%

Very bad

0

0.0%

I don't know

0

0.0%

13

100.0%

Total

4.a) How did your group prepare for your supervisor meetings? - We discussed the agenda before the meeting Respondents

Percent

Allways

7

77.8%

Usually

2

22.2%

Sometimes

0

0.0%

Rarely

0

0.0%

Never

0

0.0%

I don't know

0

0.0%

Total

9

100.0%

4.a) How did your group prepare for your supervisor meetings? - We sent a written agenda and/or relevant parts of the project to the supervisor before the meeting Respondents

Percent

Allways

8

88.9%

Usually

1

11.1%

Sometimes

0

0.0%

Rarely

0

0.0%

Never

0

0.0%

I don't know

0

0.0%

Total

9

100.0%

4.a) Any additional preparation? (…)

Correct the text in order to understand what we wrote.

4.a) 4.a) How did you prepare for the supervisor meetings? - Before the meeting I carefully considered what I would like to discuss with the supervisor Respondents

Percent

Always

1

25.0%

Usually

2

50.0%

Sometimes

0

0.0%

Rarely

0

0.0%

Never

0

0.0%

Don't know

1

25.0%

Total

4

100.0%

4.a) How did you prepare for the supervisor meetings? - I sent a written agenda and/or relevant parts of the project to the supervisor before the meeting Respondents

Percent

Always

2

50.0%

Usually

2

50.0%

Sometimes

0

0.0%

Rarely

0

0.0%

Never

0

0.0%

Don't know

0

0.0%

Total

4

100.0%

4.a) Any additional preparation? (…)

5. Do you have any ideas as to how the supervision can be improved or any comments in general? (…) Our group in general could have been faster in deciding on a topic/problem formulation. Therefore it probably

was hard for the supervisor to give input. On a personal level he seems like a nice guy who is intereseted in the students and their backgrounds. This helps in creating a comfortable feeling towards the supervision. He does know a lot about the industry we wrote about. Because of his "real life job" there were little opporunities for meetings, though he committed to unpleasend times. It took our supervisor long to responde to emails (23 days). Beeing on vacation as a supervisor in the two weeks before project submission didn't help the supervision. Our group didn't get any input on written parts of the project only on the table of content, whereas this input was "looks fine". As a group we couldn't get much out of it. I feel like he has invested half the time he was paid fore into the supervison. ( No, I don't have any idea. I think that it is OK. At vejlederen er bedre til at hjælpe når man føler sig lost og ikke bare giver en intetsigende mail om det man har skrevet, hvilket har med virket til at man føler at det projekt man har lavet ikke er blvet så godt som det kunne. dette er pga den mangel på feedback på det skrevne, hvor man selv især når man skriver alene første gang stirrer sig blind på det man har skrevet. et forslag kunne være at uni blev bedre til at fortælle noget om dette projekt og de krav der er til det, så man ikke farer i vilde efter hvad man tror man skal gøre.. we had a lack of communication with our supervisor due to the lack of time therefore we didnt get a feedback about overall project idea only about methodology part wixh was also not exhaustive enough By giving more accurate advices. By following the same red line instead of confusing the group. hope supervisor can point out our main weakness and guide us how to figure out the problem during the process of writing project (…)

Language Respondents

Percent

Danish

5

29.4%

English

12

70.6%

Total

17

100.0%

Respondents

Percent

E-mail

0

-

Paper

0

-

Merge

0

-

Total

0

-

Distribution Form

E-mail

Created 2011-01-13 14:41:41 2011-01-13 14:53:28 2011-01-13 14:58:01 2011-01-13 15:02:03 2011-01-13 18:00:50 2011-01-13 22:05:55 2011-01-14 07:53:10 2011-01-14 11:55:48 2011-01-14 12:46:22 2011-01-14 13:16:00 2011-01-14 18:25:51 2011-01-16 15:36:36 2011-01-17 18:07:27 2011-01-19 09:07:16 2011-01-21 10:06:06 2011-01-26 16:57:00 2011-01-28 15:27:53

Overall Status Respondents

Percent

New

0

0.0%

Distributed

0

0.0%

Partially Complete

4

23.5%

Complete

13

76.5%

Rejected

0

0.0%

17

100.0%

Total